A rating agency S&P kept America’s credit rating at AAA. However for the first time in its 70 years rating history of the US debt, the agency cut its outlook from “stable” to “negative”. A negative outlook means there is a one-third chance of a downgrade below AAA in the next two years. It is yet another sign that the financial crisis is progressing as expected. This can hardly be called a blow for US debt. It is simply a well predicted result. One can also reasonably expect a US grand finale in some form predicted in an article "A US way out?" two years ago.
The lower the US, and indeed any other country's, debt rating the higher the interest rate that has to be paid on it. Hence the beneficiaries are the banks that, incidentally, caused such massive sovereign debt mounting in the first instance by engineering the pyramid scheme that collapsed causing the credit crunch in September 2008. As predicted two and half years ago "The largest heist in history" continues and there seems to be no end to it in sight.
The lower the US, and indeed any other country's, debt rating the higher the interest rate that has to be paid on it. Hence the beneficiaries are the banks that, incidentally, caused such massive sovereign debt mounting in the first instance by engineering the pyramid scheme that collapsed causing the credit crunch in September 2008. As predicted two and half years ago "The largest heist in history" continues and there seems to be no end to it in sight.

I quite sure this is, perhaps #2, one of the greatest shortcomings of we humans.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LubuSAgB5s
The 3rd greatest problem – forfeiture of the “‘m,”
ReplyDeletegreg - where you at man? things going on and you have nothing to say...? all good or not?
ReplyDeleteDear Reginald
ReplyDeleteI have written what I had to say. Basically what's happening now is well described in the first article on this blog: "The largest heist in history" (which was written two and half years ago but it is more up to date than ever). I have rehashing my old articles, as I have already done, saying "I told you so long time ago". Maybe it gives some satisfaction (and who does not like it?) but ultimately it is a bit of waste of time.
So now I am leaving all to the mainstream commentators from likes of the FT or The Economist. I have actually started working on the account of the current crisis in more scientific way. But this will take a couple of years for me to get it to a publishable state.
Thanks and best wishes
Greg